Monday, October 21, 2013

Taxes for personal use

"Taxpayer Abuse for…Personal Use?" by Ross Kecseg talks about how the city of Fort Worth Texas has been using taxes for their own use such as "Apple products, car washes, clothes, liquor..".  An investigation was done and their was questionable receipts that are most likely not for the city use such as $600 dollars spent on premium liquor over a three month period.  A bond is now being asked, (maybe to distract from their wrong doing), to fund for projects to help improve the city. 

     Kecseg has provided support by getting his information from Mireya Villarreal  who did the investigation. Her credentials come from CBS news. Kecseg himself is creditable because he was background in economics along with public policy. He is also still active in local, state and national political campaigns. He does bring up strong points such as giving us the estimates of money being spent and how much funds the city allocates. "After all, the city allocates more funds annually for ‘Non-Departmental Expenses’ ($73million) than it does on ‘Infrastructure’ ($60million).  Debt service consumes $72 million of its $1.2 billion Operating Budget." This provides the supporting evidence to help his argument. The city was given a chance to defend themselves but a "no comment" was used so Kecseg did give the option to see the other side. His only weak point was giving out more variety of statements from the city of Fort Worth. He concludes with advice of what the city should be doing with the money which what is offered is just good nature. Overall he did a good job because he did his research and provided the resources. His knowledge on the current topic shows. 

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Are women being heard?

     In Phillips: Davis’ filibuster shifts abortion debate to women’s rights, she talks about how even though women have been in office, it seems like they still don't get the respect they deserve. They can be elected as governor or be a member of Congress but that doesn't mean that they are still being heard is Mrs. Phillips eyes. She talks about abortion and it is seem as a sensitive subject to females since they are the ones carry the child so they should be the ones that have a say on the subject of abortion.  
     She states that “Know your place. We’re in charge.” is what basically men say to women which is a bit extreme. Mrs. Phillips intends to speak to woman who feel like they don't have a voice when it comes to the option of abortion so she provides information about Senate Bill 5 which is the abortion regulations. With the author being a female as well, she is going to be passionate on this topic but it is bias. She shouldn't bash men on how they want women to know their place because it can be seen as  a thing in the past. Mrs. Phillips does bring up woman in the past who have made it to office as if to make a point that we are making history but we are still basically just sitting on the sideline. 
     I do not agree with this because her argument is seeing to much of a women's point of view that it is obvious she does care to see the other side's argument. I felt like women have made a big impact but she doesn't seem to acknowledge that fact. 


http://www.statesman.com/news/news/opinion/davis-filibuster-shifts-abortion-debate-to-womens-/nYYmg/